Coby Mayo, Jackson Holliday Headline 10 Statcast Standouts (July 1)

0

Image credit: Orioles 3B prospect Coby Mayo (Photo by Brian Westerholt/Four Seam Images)

Every Monday morning we’ll highlight several players who stood out to us based on their underlying Statcast metrics. These are not full scouting reports, but can often serve as good early indicators of prospects who might be ready to break out, or are demonstrating MLB-ready skills.

Last week, both of our headliners got promotions to the big leagues, which is always a nice coincidence. This week, we’ll be discussing:

  • The Platonic Ideal of the Analytical Data Darling
  • The key thing Jackson Holliday needs to work on
  • Early look at data on Dylan Crews, Moises Ballesteros and Agustin Ramirez
  • A Guardians prospect who hits the ball really hard (Not Noel)
  • A massively undervalued Rays bat
  • A Canadian! Happy Canada Day!
  • Kyle Manzardo’s L/R Splits
  • The Next Great Closer

You can access the data below via Baseball Savant.

Related prospect rankings:

10 Statcast Standouts

Coby Mayo, 3B, Orioles

It appears I can’t resist writing about Coby Mayo, with good reason: he’s the Platonic Ideal of the Analytical Data Darling. That’s a fancy way of saying he checks a lot of analytical boxes that we look for, specifically this list:

  • Makes Lots of Contact, Especially In Zone? ☑
  • Hits Both Righties and Lefties? ☑
  • Hits The Ball Hard? ☑
  • Hits The Ball in The Air? ☑
  • Young for the Level? ☑
  • Doesn’t Chase Too Much? ☑
  • Track Record of Performance? ☑☑

Through Saturday’s games, Mayo has a very robust .310/.381/.638 slash line for the Norfolk Tides. This follows a season where he posted a 1.000+ OPS in Double-A, and an improvement on a .905 OPS in his first taste of Triple-A last year. Let’s break down Mayo’s strengths and show you where he might have some minor areas of improvement.

Coby Mayo’s Slugging/Aggression Chart Against All Pitches

I like to split the zone into a 5×5 grid. It helps to align with other metrics, such as zone contact and chase rates. The color scale and the numbers indicate how much damage a player does when he puts the ball in play. One thing becomes very clear: Mayo does most of his damage against pitches in the zone.

The size of each box indicates Mayo’s swing percentage at pitches in that area of the zone (or out of it). We see that he swings the most at pitches in the top-middle section. This is what a disciplined approach looks like: swings clustered where they should be, with relatively few swings on pitches out of the zone, and even fewer in the outer ring.

Coby Mayo’s Contact/Aggression Profile vs 4-Seam Fastballs

We didn’t list this as an analytical check box, but let’s add another one to the list: Mayo can make contact against four-seam fastball up in the zone. In this visual, the color indicates how much contact a batter makes when they swing, with 60% and below colored in green, and anything 90% and above colored in red. We also see that he loves to swing at the fastball up, with swing rates north of 84% for pitches in the upper third. He absolutely does not swing at any four-seamers in the bottom third or below. This is a fantastic sign of a batter that has a disciplined approach, and the ability to execute the approach.

Coby Mayo vs Breaking Pitches

Panic! Mayo chases way too much down and away. Fear not, the box down and away is one pitch. The one to the right of that is five pitches. The two boxes to the right of those are 20 and 15 pitches respectively, and Mayo shows tremendous discipline there. We also see tremendous discipline in general against breaking pitches, as he swings a lot less than against fastballs. However, when he does attack the breaking ball in the zone, he does damage, with five of his home runs coming against mistakes. Here’s the same chart, but showing slugging on contact:

If you throw a breaking ball to Mayo, he’s likely to spit on the pitch. If you hang it in the zone, he’ll probably crush it. Let’s zoom back out and see Mayo’s contact profile against all the pitches he saw through Saturday:

We see a contact profile that covers almost the entire zone, with his two worst zones being up-and-in and down-middle, at 67% and 76% respectively. He’s targeting that upper-middle area and making oodles of contact. As we saw in the first chart, he’s crushing the ball when he makes contact up-and-in in the zone, so it’s not like pitchers are going to be looking to challenge him there.

This is hopefully the last time that I’ll be writing about Mayo (hopefully he’ll be in the majors soon), so let’s dive even deeper and break down his analytical metrics vs both RHPs and LHPs, beginning with RHPs, as that’s his tougher matchup as a righty bat.

If you want to read these charts at a glance, go to the bottom row where it says “All Pitches” and scan for gold. The darker the gold, the better, the more purple, the worse the metric is. You can then scan up and see how that looks when broken into a smaller piece, such as sliders. All numbers are relative to the MLB average, so that you can easily see if he’s above average at something, with the caveat that this is against Triple-A pitching.

Let’s go back to the analytical check boxes. When we talk about chase rates, we’re mostly concerned about chasing breaking balls (sliders, sweepers and curves) as well as offspeed pitches (changeups and splitters). The previous charts strongly suggested he was going to shine in that respect. Indeed he does, with minuscule chase rates against non-fastballs. This is a huge box to check. It demonstrates his tremendous approach at the plate, even against the harder matchup. He’s also able to avoid swing and miss against breaking balls the few times he does chase.

For Zone Contact, I usually key in on the fastballs. That’s the pitch pitchers will typically use to attack hitters in the zone. Here again, we see more gold coloring, indicating Mayo has no trouble getting to above-average bat-to-ball ability in the zone. Now what makes Mayo an outstanding hitting prospect is his rare ability to make hard contact in the air. Against righties, he shows a remarkable ability to lift nearly every pitch type (including fastballs, which have a higher baseline launch angle), and does so with authority.

I look through a lot of data, and I can’t think of another prospect that makes this much contact, with this much power, and also hits the ball in the air.

If you thought his metrics against righthanders were good, they’re even better when he has the matchup advantage against lefties, with perhaps a touch too much chase sliders. We see an incredible average exit velocity of 96.1 mph, which is borderline elite, and fully backed up by his elite 90th percentile ext velocities. At the risk of beating the same drum again, we see much the same story, an extremely potent analytical profile, where we have to zoom in on a subset to find something that Mayo isn’t (yet) excelling at. If he can replicate these kind of exit velocities and launch angles against major league lefties, he’ll be hitting a lot of home runs.

I look through a lot of data, and I can’t think of another prospect that makes this much contact, with this much power, and also hits the ball in the air. This is why Mayo represents the Platonic Ideal of the Analytical Data Darling.

Jackson Holliday, 2B, Orioles

I’ve somehow never written about Holliday in this series. Let’s correct that error today, and do a deep dive on back-to-back Orioles prospects.

My first step when looking at a lefthanded batter is to check on how they perform against same-side pitchers. That’s a matchup many left handed batters struggle with. We see very clearly what fuels Holliday’s success: elite chase rates, even against LHPs. He simply does not chase, period. When he does chase, he’s able to make enough contact to avoid swing and miss. This comes at the expense of some in-zone aggression, but it’s very rare to have a batter this young with this level of plate discipline. The red flags in this profile vs LHPS are the below-average zone contact rates, against all pitch types, as well as the lack of above-average thump in his bat against LHPs, sitting just below major league average.

Against RHPs, where he has the matchup advantage, we see a very similar story, with even better plate discipline, with lower chase rates and more in-zone aggression. While his top-end exit velocities are slightly below major league average for now, he makes consistent hard contact against RHPs, against all pitch types, with the caveat that he isn’t able to get the ball in the air with consistency. It is somewhat concerning that he isn’t making a ton of in-zone contact yet, but there’s a giant caveat with all of these data points: Holliday is extremely young for the level.

The art of projecting young players is forecasting the aspects of the game that they’ll be able to improve on as they mature. Young players often see moderate gains in contact ability as they accumulate experience, much more often than we see a player go from being a free swinger to an ultra-disciplined hitter like Holliday. I’m very confident in projecting Holliday’s approach to translate to the majors. I’m somewhat confident that he’ll make enough gains in bat to ball, that his elite approach will shine through at the major league level.

Let’s dig a little deeper into Holliday’s approach, using our aggression/contact charts:

We see he is keying in on a specific area of the zone, and ignoring pretty much anything that is on the inner third. He needs to work on his swing against fastballs up in the zone, as that looks like a current hole in his swing, and a likely target in the major leagues. While he does have two home runs against four-seam fastballs up, he doesn’t yet do a ton of damage against fastballs up:

In my opinion, this is the key area that Holliday needs to work on before he’s thrown back against major league pitching. Holliday isn’t Mike Trout, but it does remind me of that time when the book on Trout was to simply attack him at the top of zone. Needless to say, Trout figured it out, and all signs point to Holliday figuring it out as well. Players with this pedigree, major league bloodlines and performance track record at a very young age, tend to take leaps. When Jackson figures it out, the Orioles might just have a historically great infield.

Dylan Crews, OF, Nationals

We don’t have a ton of pitches for Crews at Triple-A just yet, so we’ll have to settle for a brief overview, rather than a deep dive, as we need larger sample sizes to properly break down a player. In the early going, he’s showing a much improved contact rate, up from percentages in the low 70s last year and in Double-A this year, to a stellar 80.7% through Saturday, including 87% on pitches in the zone.

He’s posting above-average exit velocities, with a 105 mph 90th percentile exit velocity (+1 mph compared to the major league average), as well as an average exit velocity of 90.7 mph, which is closer to 2 mph above the major league average. These aren’t the monstrous exit velocities that you’ll get from fellow Nationals prospect James Wood, but they are plenty good. His 92 mph average exit velocity on balls hit in the air (20 degrees or higher launch angle) suggests he’ll be able to get to most of his power, as he makes better contact on balls he lifts.

Moises Ballesteros, C/1B, Cubs

Ballesteros is a baller, with a stellar track record of performance at every level, even without giving him credit for being extremely young at each stop. Through Saturday’s games, Ballesteros is off to a .366/.409./.561 start to his early Triple-A career. As with Crews, we don’t yet have enough data to do a full deep dive, but he’s already posting a 106 mph 90th percentile exit velocity (plus raw power), and he has a long track record of making contact, with contact rates above 75% at every stop in 2023, and I expect that his 72% contact rate at Triple-A in the very early going will trend up to the 75-80% mark as he gets more reps, and tones down the aggression somewhat.

Ballesteros has flown under the radar somewhat as he may or may not be a catcher, which adds a ton of variability to his projection. He’s rapidly ascending to the top of the catching prospect ranks, along with the next guy on this list:

Agustin Ramirez, C, Yankees

Ramirez is a shining example of how important patience is when evaluating prospects, because every now and then, there’s an exception that breaks the rules of thumb we often apply to prospects. In this instance, when a guy is old for the level, and repeats a level, especially in the complex league, we tend to write them off. This is a reasonable heuristic to apply, as J.J. Cooper outlined, showing that prospects repeating even Low-A is a large red flag, let alone the complex league.

So let’s celebrate what looks to be the rare exception, a prospect who repeated a complex league level in 2022, then had a massive breakout last year, reaching Double-A. This year, he absolutely hit the cover off the ball at Double-A, hitting 16 home runs and forcing his way onto the Triple-A roster, where he’s struggled in the really early going, and outside of his lone home run, his early data are showing low EVs, with more swing and miss than he had before. However, his track record over his last season and a half, as well as the EVs he put up in Single-A, strongly suggest he’ll recapture the form he showed in Double-A, once he adjusts.

I usually only write up guys with interesting Statcast data, however, in my mind, Ballesteros and Ramirez are always intertwined as catchers who are relatively under the radar, but deserving of more attention. I’m a huge believer in Ramirez’s bat, and we’ll check back in again in a month or two to see if the data reject or confirm said belief.

José Tena, SS, Guardians

Tena was recently promoted to the Guardians, so let’s take a look at what to expect from him.

Tena makes really hard contact, with plus to plus-plus exit velocities, belying his 5-foot-9 frame, however much of that contact is into the ground, which severely limits his offensive upside. He’s also extremely aggressive, with high chase rates, and a subpar ability to make contact when he chases.

Tena provides an excellent contrast to the elite approach of Jackson Holliday:

Here we see lots of aggression out of the zone, and even more so against breaking balls:

I’m not overly confident this approach will work at the major league level, but he does hit the ball really hard. Sometimes that can be enough to carry a player as they work on fixing other holes in their game.

Ronny Simon, 2B, Rays

Simon caught my eye in the inaugural article of this series, and somehow he’s escaped my notice since then. I’m out of town next week, but he looks like a good candidate as a headliner in couple of weeks.

Simon is a switch-hitter, which means he’s actually two different hitters. Let’s see what he looks like as a righty:

Against lefties, he’s showing plus exit velocities, with strong contact quality, and a unique ability to make contact against pitches he chases, a big reason he’s been able to keep his K% below 20% so far this year.

From the left side of the plate, we see much better contact rates, especially in zone, where he shows exceptional bat-to-ball ability. He shows average to plus raw power from the left side, which combined with his strong contact skills and up-the-middle profile, makes him look like yet another Tampa Bay Ray who’s going to put up a lot of very quiet, but very useful 2-3 win seasons in the major leagues.

Owen Caissie, OF, Cubs

It’s Canada Day, so it behooves this author to look at a premium Canadian baseball player. Let’s begin by looking at Caissie in the L/L matchup:

The good: Caissie doesn’t chase.
The bad: When he does chase sliders, he doesn’t make a lot of contact.

The good: Solid ability ability to lift the ball.
The bad: Underwhelming average and top-end exit velos.

For the most part when I look at a lefty hitter I want to know if they can hold their own against four-seam fastballs in the zone and make enough contact to be viable. The early data would suggest Caissie might be able to hold his own against LHPs.

When he has the platoon advantage, we see the real Caissie, with massive top-end exit velocities, easily plus-plus, but only plus from an average exit velocity perspective. We’ll do a more thorough break down later in the season, or if he gets called up.

Kyle Manzardo, 1B, Guardians

That’s a solid gold approach + contact + power combination when Manzardo has the platoon advantage. It’s not surprising that he’s been on fire in Triple-A recently. He’s rolling over a lot of offspeed pitches, which is his only weak spot in terms of contact quality.

The story against LHPs isn’t quite as stellar though, but he have very limited samples.

The thing to focus on here is the overall exit velocities against LHPs, which are on the low end, likely due to the majority of his balls in play coming against sliders, as he is far too passive with in-zone fastballs. It’s a very weird L/L profile, with some promising traits (contact) that could allow him to at least tread water when he doesn’t have the platoon advantage.

Zach Maxwell, RHP, Reds

Does Maxwell have an 80-grade fastball in terms of pure stuff? He might. Let’s look at some of his fastball metrics:

  • He averages 99.2 MPH, and has been up 101.9
  • He gets 18.8 inches of IVB, which is the equivalent of 19.7 inches for a pitch with average velo
  • Gets about 3 inches more ride than a typical pitcher will get from that arm slot
  • 24% Zone whiff rate
  • StuffPro has it as 1.9 runs better than average
  • My SMOKE score has it as 1.5 runs better than the average four-seam fastball

That’s as close to an 80-grade pure stuff fastball as you can get, and it might play even with subpar command. Because the fastball is so nasty, his slider/cutter is performing admirably, getting whiffs on over 50% of swings. If you’re in a dynasty fantasy baseball league, this may just be the rare closer prospect worth stashing.

Download our app

Read the newest magazine issue right on your phone